Monday, 10 August 2026

Drumbeat

The following article, Ellington In Private written by Irving Townsend,is one of my favourite pieces of journalism about Duke Ellington and about one of my favourite albums. The eyewitness piece gives the reader a real "you were there" sense. It has been on and off the radar over the years. When I happened across the piece on a recent Google crawl, I copied the hyperlink and decided I would post the entire text, for reference, here. With the 70th anniversary of recording the album A Drum Is A Woman, its posting is particularly timely. As ever, no infringement of copyright is intended and the respective rights holders are listed below.

Note the similarity of the model on the cover of the album to the subject of our previous post... 



As originally published in
The Atlantic Monthly

May 1975


Ellington in Private


Few men so eloquently "wordy" have ever revealed so little of themselves to the world as did Duke Ellington. As some men hide behind public silence, he hid behind public phrases to build the walls around him ever higher.

by Irving Townsend



DUKE ELLINGTON and I faced each other alone for the first time in a tent in Newport, Rhode Island, in 1956. He was waiting go on stage to play at George Wein's Newport Jazz Festival. It was an appearance that Ellington had his doubts about, and with good reason; an appearance important to him, and therefore one for which he had carefully prepared. He had not been drawing large audiences. The lucrative college dates had been going to the Brubeck Quartet, Miles Davis, and Erroll Garner. The Basie band was riding high. The jazz impressario Norman Granz, Duke believed, was ignoring him in favor of Louis Armstrong and Ella Fitzgerald. Even George Wein was not sure enough of Ellington's drawing power to make him the star attraction.

Ellington the composer was also in limbo. His best writing was, according to his ever-present critics, fifteen years behind him, and he was reminded of it wherever he went. All anybody wanted to hear was "Sophisticated Lady" and "Mood Indigo." Jazz writers reminisced in print about the old band. They lamented the loss of Cootie Williams and "Tricky Sam"; of Barney Bigard and Lawrence Brown; of Ben Webster. They blasted the pyrotechnics of Cat Anderson and the trifles Ellington called his latest compositions.

Also, and unfortunately for me since I represented Columbia Records, Ellington was not feeling kindly toward record companies. His years of hits during the big-band days were long gone. His last Columbia contract had produced neither sales nor distinguished albums, and record executives sought only new versions of the same old tunes. He was anxious to record Night Creature, a work written and scored for a symphony orchestra and the Ellington band, but the project was too expensive. No record company wanted Ellington plus a hundred men playing music "out of his category," which, of course, was jazz.

But there was reason to hope for better things. Ellington at fifty-seven had survived the collapse of the rest of the bands by being willing to accept low prices, by accepting all one-nighters. Staying home did not appeal to him, and he was writing every day. Johnny Hodges had returned to the sax section, and Duke, sitting opposite me in that dressing tent, was willing to listen to my proposal: a three-year contract at regular royalties with a thousand-dollar advance for each recorded side. That, like all advances, appealed to him. One record session would meet the band payroll for a week, and there had been too many weeks recently when Duke had met the payroll of the highest-paid band anywhere out of money he made as a writer and publisher of his own music. Also, long experience with the vagaries of record royalty statements had convinced Ellington to get all he could in front. "But my loot comes from publishing," he reminded me. "We have to make new things. Don't talk to me 'bout no 'Sophisticated Lady.'"

I agreed. I shared the opinion of Columbia's Goddard Lieberson that it was a record company's responsibility to introduce and to preserve new music. My boss had been financing a distinguished series of music by contemporary American composers out of the profits of Mitch Miller's hits. These hits could also pay for the new music of Ellington, who, I happened to believe, was the greatest of American composers. "What have you got in mind?" I asked.

I heard the warning tromp of Harry Carney's foot on the platform above us, then two beats and the opening of Ellington's theme, "Take The 'A' Train," muffled by the folds of canvas around us. Duke lit a cigarette. "Did you know," he asked me, "that a drum is a woman?"

"'A' Train" was building. I knew Duke would walk across the stage only at the final, extended chord, precisely late as always. I knew that if I did not have his agreement before that chord, I might not see him alone again for weeks. "Is that the first album?" I asked. I was not going to take his bait.

He laughed. His laugh was an explosive crack, nasal and slightly suggestive, followed by a swallowed afterlaugh. "Man, that's not only the first album, that's the mother of all albums. That's the story of Madam Zajj."

The band blew on. "'A' Train" was entering its endless ending. Ellington stood up. "Madam Zajj," he stretched the words. "She was always a lady, you know, but she was also a drum."

"Do we have a deal?" I asked as he turned toward the stage.

"Record companies don't like me," Duke warned. "Are you sure you won't get fired?"

I assured him I wouldn't.

"See you in New York next week," he called, disappearing through the tent flap.

I remained in the tent, listening to the soft purr of Ellington's traditional greeting to his audience, the credit to Billy Strayhorn as the composer of "'A' Train," the assurance that he loved them all madly, the modesty joke as he called upon "the piano player" for the next number, "Satin Doll." I had no doubts about the success of my deal with Duke. Nor did I have a suspicion that both his life and mine were about to change dramatically. Before Ellington left Newport he was to introduce a new suite, written and named for the festival, including a section in which tenor saxophonist Paul Gonsalves was to play one hundred and twenty-eight choruses that would cause a near riot in the audience and would give Duke his first best-selling album. And I did not realize that Duke was about to begin a decade in which he would write more new and more widely acclaimed music than he had in years, would win a worldwide audience and receive more honors than had ever before been bestowed upon an American composer. I did not realize either that I was to be a part of that decade of Ellington.


THE recording and editing of Ellington's A Drum Is A Woman took up most of three months, a period which established my relationship with Duke and made possible a fairly intimate knowledge of this fascinating and complex man. I learned about Ellington in a trial by fire, in night after night of working until dawn; and although we were to be associated in many other projects, and to be friends ever after, those first months were never surpassed for concentrated study of the paradoxes that made up Duke Ellington.

I learned quickly that Ellington had a passion for privacy. I soon understood that he revealed small parts of himself to many different people, thereby satisfying his need to be close to what he called his family, while at the same time denying a complete and too revealing portrait of the whole man to any one person. It would take a convention of Ellington friends and relatives, pooling their knowledge of him, to put Ellington together, and even then, like a jigsaw puzzle with missing pieces, he would emerge with patches of empty space in crucial places.

And it did not take long to understand his pride. He did not underestimate himself and realized, of course, that nobody else did either. He could relish the turning of understatement into Ellingtonian exaggeration when he referred to himself as "the piano player." He alternated between the royal "we," the modest "we," and the plural "we" with ease, and often in the same sentence. He was fond of cliche, but only his own, and even the dialects of his conversation were polished.

A Drum Is A Woman is one of Ellington's most complicated fantasies. It is also one of his most self-revealing works. It is an allegory paralleling the history of jazz, as he described it, in which an elaborately fabricated drum is turned into a very sophisticated lady who travels from Africa to the Caribbean to New Orleans to New York City and finally to the moon, meeting in each place a simple man always named Joe, and touching him with her spell before leaving him for the next Joe. The idea was first suggested by Duke to Orson Welles in 1941, set aside, but never forgotten. One explanation of Ellington's prolific output is that he never abandoned an idea just because nobody reacted favorably to it. Only time kept all his dreams from being realized, and there was never enough of that. He used to tell me about a ballet idea he had involving an ex-beautician from Harlem who became the queen of a West Indian island. She dazzled her subjects by changing the color of the ocean around them as often as she had once changed the colors of her customers' hair. The story had every Ellington element in it.

To understand and to work with Ellington, it was essential to understand the members of his band, who were, like all who were close to Duke, extensions of himself. Each to Ellington was a sound in the mosaic of his music. Each, in an odd way, personified a part of the total Ellington personality. The longer I knew Duke, the more convinced I became that he needed many bodies, many separated minds and fingers, to reveal himself. This multibodied personality was most apparent in the Ellington-Strayhorn unity. Billy Strayhorn, Ellington's only co-writer, was a classically educated musician, small in stature, quiet in his ways, shunning the spotlight and the grand manner. He was both antithesis and metaphor to Ellington. He knew Ellington's mind so well that he could and often did compose sections of the same suite, sections indistinguishable from Ellington's contributions. Yet I was intrigued by the musical difference between them. To me, Strayhorn expressed the feminine side of Ellington. There is a delicately blended mixture of male and female in all of us, and in the music they created together Ellington and Strayhorn completed this balance.

Duke Ellington's beginning our association with his story of jazz was surprising to me. Ellington by the mid-fifties had been winning jazz polls for years, had been so firmly categorized by critics and the businessmen of music that the very word jazz angered him. As Whitney Balliett has observed, Ellington's music was "based squarely on the rhythms and harmonies and structures of jazz." and certainly Duke was proud that he and jazz had had similar origins, just as he was always most comfortable in music when his band settled down to a cooking beat and the shared excitement of improvisation. I do not believe he fought jazz as music, or as a musical cage in which he felt himself to be trapped. The music represented qualities of freedom, of humor, and of invention exemplified in his own work. He often left jazz behind, just as he left Harlem for the cities of the world, but he was never ashamed to be home again.

Ellington fought the word jazz because it had come to represent an economic ghetto for musical minorities, and Ellington had had his share of discrimination. When his band played Las Vegas in the fifties, they were not allowed to enter the casino whose stage they graced. When they played Miami Beach, they could not stay in the hotel that hired them. In music all categories are restrictive, but for much of Ellington's career jazz was surrounded by economic and even social walls. He used to introduce his trumpet player, Clark Terry as "a musician beyond category." Each time he said the words he was silently including himself.

A Drum Is A Woman is Ellington's "parallel" of jazz, written, composed, narrated, and performed by a man who saw himself as the one "Joe" that Madam Zajj could not leave behind. To the end of his life he thought of Drum as one of his supreme achievements.


ELLINGTON got his first break as a bandleader at the Cotton Club audition. He arrived late by mistake. But the boss who was to hire a band that day also arrived late; too late, in fact, to hear Ellington's competitor for the job. Duke's band was hired, and Duke was never late accidentally again. Afterwards he timed his lateness, and turned it into a performance as polished and climactic as his music.

At the first recording session for A Drum Is A Woman, I was introduced to this Ellington style. As the hour for the recording approached, one man, Harry Carney, was in his chair in the sax section. Carney's place in the Ellington hierarchy was second to none, but Harry just could not be late. During the next hour Russell Procope, another veteran with a penchant for promptness, arrived to sit beside Carney. John Sanders, the conscientious librarian for the band, passed out new music, and Sam Woodyard wandered idly through the studio looking for his drums.

During the first two hours of the allotted three-hour session, while the engineer and I sat in the control room wondering if we would ever begin, the band arrived one at a time. The last sideman to sit down was Johnny Hodges, the highest-paid member of the band. The group, now in place, began to complain loudly about wasting all night just sitting around. At that moment Ellington walked into the room, stopping to kiss his female visitors, chatting with everybody as he worked his way slowly toward the piano. Then, with a bow toward the control room, he asked, "Am I late? Oh, dear. What time is it anyway?" He never wore a watch.

Ellington's formula for avoiding anger was as carefully considered and studiously followed as his pattern for lateness. He told me once how to avoid the corrosive effects of dispute. "Never talk to anybody on the telephone unless you're lying flat on your back in the bed." Over the years I often witnessed strong provocation for Ellington outrage, but rarely did I see him angry. There was the time, for instance, when a member of the band quit and took the entire first-trumpet book with him, a loss that would have put the average band out of business and sent its leader off to a rest home. Duke simply faked it until a new book could be prepared.

While we were recording a new version of his "Happy-Go-Lucky Local" in a Hollywood studio, he mentioned that the piece had been stolen, re-titled, and turned into a well-known hit by another musician. "You can sue for every cent of royalties," I reminded him. He turned to me and said, "We must be flattered and just go write something better."

But anger could flare up in Ellington. When, on rare occasions, a band member arrived for an Ellington date later than he did, Duke was furious. We were in his suite at the Warwick Hotel in New York City one afternoon when his publicist, Joe Morgen, arrived with a copy of one of the now defunct picture magazines in which there was a feature article by a reporter who had discovered that Duke's legal wife, from whom he had long been separated, was living in Washington, D.C. Ellington took one look at the caption and the photographs, then stared silently at the traffic on Sixth Avenue. This was a penetration of his privacy. I have never seen him so angry.

Ellington heard the advice of many, listened to the advice of few, took almost nobody's. Before his appearance at one of the Monterey Jazz Festivals, West Coast counterpart of the Newport Jazz Festival, Jimmy Lyons, who coordinated the nightly programs, entered the Ellington bus to discuss Duke's part of the nightly program. Lyons had one favor to ask: that Duke not include his now famous Newport Festival Suite in the Monterey program. Any reference to Newport, Lyons felt, was unnecessary on his competitive stage. Ellington listened, made no comment while he continued to choose his wardrobe from his traveling closet. No sooner had the last sounds of "'A' Train" faded into the gathering fog, however, than Duke announced as his opening number a section of the Newport Suite. Whether it was petulance, or good programming, or just Ellington, the message to Monterey's master of ceremonies was clear.

Duke used strange methods for disciplining his band of unruly stars. I never heard him fire anybody. He tolerated the intolerable from his musicians, both because he respected their right to exercise their idiosyncrasies as he did, and because confrontation was bad for his digestion. He reserved his anger for those outside his circle, and that anger, while durable, was seldom explosive. It arose always from what he considered to be unjust treatment of himself and those he was fond of, and the subjects of his rages were always out of sight. His way of punishing a band member for an infraction of his almost nonexistent regulations, or for any deviation from the normal casual behavior, was typically oblique. He would call upon the culprit to stand for endless solos (I have watched Duke keep Paul Gonsalves or Hodges or Cootie thus in front of the band), calling out every number that featured him, meanwhile lavishing high praise upon him, encouraging calls of "Encore!" from the audience over the breathless protests of the victim. It was punishment indeed.


DURING one of the long nights of editing Drum, a subject came up in our conversation that revealed a side of Ellington I had never known before. "You're a lucky man," he said, "because you have a family." That was also the night Duke told me he included me in his family, a flattering announcement that took me a long while to understand.

Duke Ellington was seldom alone except in bed, and not always there. Yet he was the most solitary and secretive man I ever knew. His prescription for privacy was as elaborate as every other precept for his peace of mind. He surrounded himself with what he referred to as circles of family. One of the innermost circles was made up of his son, Mercer, his sister, Ruth, and their families, who were his only relatives. Close friends, such as Billy Strayhorn and Arthur Logan, Duke's doctor, formed another inner circle, as did members of his band and their wives. As the series of concentric circles widened, they included Ellington's oldest friends around the world, fans, other musicians, mistresses and old girl friends, a few business associates: all very special people to Duke. But he not only carefully separated these circles from one another, he separated the segments of each circle, so that each of us who was included somewhere in his revolving family shared with him an exclusive part of his life. Rarely were even his closest friends gathered with him at the same time. Seldom have I seen his relatives together in one room.

An example of Duke's separated relationships was his strange treatment of a woman who undoubtedly saw more of him than any other in the last half of his life. He called her Evie, and often introduced her in my presence as Mrs. Ellington. She shared his only permanent address, a West Side apartment in New York City, and while never married to him, Evie performed many of the duties of a wife even though she was never seen with Ellington in public.

And Evie, a dark-haired, handsome woman, a former dancer with a dancer's long legs and grace of movement, not only remained in an almost impenetrable background, but was completely separated from the rest of Duke's family. When he was in New York, she drove him to his appointments in the black Cadillac he had given her, her prized possession. She joined us for late-night "breakfasts" in the Hickory House on Fifty-second Street, sitting quietly beside Ellington, seldom joining the conversation. Most of the time Evie lived alone, because most of the time Ellington lived in hotel rooms around the world. But I saw Evie often during these lonely periods, and came to understand both how much she loved him and how painfully insecure she felt her position in his life to be.

Then there was Arthur Logan, a distinguished Harlem surgeon and civic leader, who was much more than a doctor to Duke. He never missed a recording session and would sit with his attractive wife, Marion, on the sidelines until all hours of the night, somehow managing to appear in his clinic at eight every morning. Arthur was the doctor for the entire Ellington band, and included me among his patients, but it was to Duke that he gave his time and his devotion. Ellington, who appeared to many to lead a life which defied all the rules for good health, was in fact scrupulously cautious about taking care of himself. He traveled with an overnight bag filled with various pills and medications; usually spent half of each day in bed, although it was always the half when everybody else was up; and called Arthur Logan from every city to ask, "How do I feel?" Logan could usually reassure him, for, as Arthur often told me, Duke was a medical marvel, with the physique of a man half his age.

The sudden death of Arthur Logan in a fall from a bridge over New York's West Side Highway in 1973 was one of the greatest losses Ellington had to sustain. To the end of his life he had the best medical care the doctors of the world could offer, but Arthur Logan was an indispensable segment of one of Duke's closest family circles.


ELLINGTON'S relationship to his band was a carefully orchestrated affair. He spent at least three or four hours a day on the bandstand, and the rest of each day in the same city with his fifteen or more traveling companions. But he never stayed in the same hotel with them for Ellington at ease was Ellington once removed. The band members could always find him. On the other hand, there were occasions when he could not find the band.

Among band members Harry Carney was closest to Duke, not only because he had been with the band longer than anyone else, but because it was Harry who drove Duke from city to city, who sat beside him in Carney's big Chrysler during those special hours of Ellington's day, the hours between two A.M. and dawn, when Duke did his most creative thinking. Carney, whose baritone saxophone was the foundation of the Ellington band, served as a rocklike presence for Ellington on the road. Duke, who would not fly until finally he had to, who would not ride in the band bus where he would be vulnerable to every complaint, sat beside Carney through the night, watching the road map, confident of Carney's driving and of his silent friendship.

Duke's family was also separated geographically. There was no large city, no small town in the country where an old friend or an old girl or both did not wait for the next one-night visit. These friendships too were for life, but they suited Ellington best because they were renewed, enjoyed, and suspended again, usually within a twenty-four-hour period. The secret of Duke's security was constant movement. He never owned a house. A thousand hotel rooms, a thousand room-service waiters ready to push his breakfast table in on cue, a thousand loyal friends waiting to handle any local problems he might have: these made up the Ellington menage. Except for daily calls to Billy Strayhorn or to Arthur Logan or to his sister, Ellington was out of town to most of his friends and family.

Still, I believe Duke Ellington was the most sentimental family man I have known. He kept in touch with all of us and never lost one of us. Each came to understand, as months and even years divided our reunions, that our place in his family was secure. We also knew that every now and then the phone would ring between six P.M. and six A.M. A dark, sleepy voice would say, "Good morning. Did I wake you? I'm so sorry. What time is it anyway? What's happening?"

Duke was back. Our day with him began.


A few months before Duke's sixtieth birthday, Arthur Logan called me to a meeting with himself and Billy Strayhorn. Arthur felt that something special should be done for the occasion. Ellington birthdays were always reasons for celebration, and always the celebration was encouraged by Duke himself, who sent out birthday cards to hundreds of friends. It was one more Ellington paradox that while he refused to recognize his own mortality, he loved birthdays. Arthur had an idea for this special birthday, and he needed our help.

Logan was horrified by the state of Ellington's music files. Much that Duke had written, even as recently as A Drum Is A Woman, was either lost or had never been properly written down. It was Arthur's idea that the three of us should spend the months before April 29, Duke's birth date, gathering up everything ever written by him, making clean copies of it, and presenting to Ellington a complete set of Ellington in bound volumes.

It sounded like a fine idea. We considered it not only a unique gift for a man who owned only his music and his wardrobe, but also a valuable contribution to future Ellington archives. But, as Billy pointed out, a lot of the original manuscripts had been lost. They would have to be taken down from records still in the hands of collectors. Also, much of the music Duke had written over the years never did have lead sheets, single-note copies of his melodies. All the scraps and bits and remembered themes must be taken down again. It was a prodigious job.

We hired John Sanders, trombonist and copyist for the band, later to become the only Ellington alumnus to enter the priesthood, and certainly one of the best-equipped members of that body to deal with the frailties of his fellow man. We swore Sanders to secrecy, set to work gathering the product of more than thirty years, and patted ourselves on the back.

The final stack of leather-bound volumes was impressive. I could not be present on the night in Logan's apartment when the presentation was to be made by Arthur and Billy, so I waited anxiously for Arthur's call the following day.

"He was impressed," Logan told me on the phone. "He made polite noises and kissed us all," he continued, his words coming more slowly, "but, you know, the son of a bitch didn't even bother to take it home."

So much for Duke Ellington's interest in his yesterdays.

The agenda of complexities of this twentieth-century genius is long and frustrating to any student of Ellington, particularly because Duke seemed such a public man and was in fact such a private one. Suave, well-mannered, literate, elegant, all these he was. Secretive, vain, suspicious, superstitious he was also. Perhaps the right word to describe my relationship with him is "parallel." a word Ellington liked to describe his own relationship with the world he moved through. And he and his friends moved together, never quite touching, never far apart.


Copyright © 1975 by Irving Townsend. All rights reserved.
The Atlantic Monthly; May 1975; "Ellington in Private"; Volume 235, No. 5; pages 78-83.
Permission to post online granted by J.N. Townsend Publishing, Exeter, NH, publishers of Irving Townsend's 
Separate Lifetimes and The Less Expensive Spread.



Tuesday, 7 July 2026

Dance, then, wherever you may be...

Beyond the Myth: Rick Anderson on His Mother’s Dance That Fueled Ellington’s Rebirth at Newport ‘56




1956. In the popular consciousness, the grandeur of swing era big bands had ceded to the vibrant electric spark of rock. One of the greatest of an era past, Duke Ellington, saw the Orchestra he had led for over three decades begin to disintegrate. Essential band members gradually jumped ship as the ensemble played to increasingly shrinking crowds. Where they once packed Carnegie Hall, they now could barely fill a small skating rink. Money was drying up, too. The band needed a miracle to continue. George Wein offered a chance to recover by calling upon Ellington and his longtime arranger Billy Strayhorn to present a three-part suite at that summer’s Newport Jazz Festival. But it seemed for naught. The entire performance, including the commission, fell flat with the audience. As the clock inched ever closer to midnight, the crowd seemed listless and tired. The legendary drummer “Papa” Jo Jones, who performed with Teddy Wilson earlier in the evening, sat at the edge of the stage. He rolled up a newspaper – or possibly a festival program – and began feverishly beating it against his knee, adding a heavy beat. The Orchestra started combining two older pieces from 1937 – Diminuendo in Blue and Crescendo in Blue – with tenor saxophonist Paul Gonsalves’ incredibly long twenty-seven-chorus solo serving as the glue. In the audience, a blonde woman in a dark dress was so moved by what she heard that she lost control. She started a near riotous dance craze that turned the crowd wild. That night saved Duke’s flailing career to the point that he would later frequently remark that he “was born in 1956 at the Newport Festival.”

Or so the tale goes. However, legends are funny things. Even when one thinks they know a story, they rarely see the entire picture. Emphasizing certain narrative elements sets aside others that make reality so much richer. After the night at Newport, the questions about the event became fixated on who. Who caused the magical evening, the mystery woman or the band itself? And who was she anyway? Yet, in many ways, the far more meaningful question was not who but why. Why was she even there? Why did she dance? Now, seven decades later, why are we still talking and thinking about that evening?

Despite the tale that still persists, the mystery dancer – Elaine Anderson – was not quite someone who became inexplicably possessed by the music. No, as her family would attest, she was a dancer at heart. Choices and circumstances had set her dream aside. She seemed to long for a different life, and Newport finally let her desires emerge for all to see.

While these facts belie the romanticized image of a figure so overwhelmed by her senses that she completely lost control, it is a mistake to think that the truth lessens the magic of that night. If anything, reality speaks even more to what Ellington’s band accomplished within Freebody Park’s stone walls and the freedom inherent in the band’s music. Even the combined title Diminuendo and Crescendo in Blue suggests a fall followed quickly by a brighter rise. Elaine Anderson never became a famous dancer. But she became something more. She became an icon, even if few ever knew her name.

So, did Anderson cause Ellington’s rebirth at Newport, or did the band simply release something lurking too long inside her? Does it truly matter? Together, dancer and band both sought freedom in a country that prides itself on liberty but supports a culture where far too often that right is not always equally applied. Seventy years after Ellington’s famed performance of July 7, 1956, it is time we better acknowledge the truth about who Elaine Anderson was and how that event came to be. It is our hope that the conversation you are about to read with her son, Rick Anderson, provides a fuller picture of his mother. But the timing of this piece is also nothing short of opportune. Anderson’s story reflects not merely her own lived experiences but also raises questions about how far America has come in addressing the social forces that hold others back and how much further we have to go. In this sense, perhaps this conversation is as much a meditation on our nation’s semiquincentennial as it is the platinum anniversary of Ellington’s performance. We just dance in the hope of what is still to come.



PostGenre: What do you feel people most misunderstand about your mother’s role at Ellington’s 1956 Newport performance?

Rick Anderson: One of the things that’s so interesting to me is the continuing perception that my mother was some anonymous gal who spontaneously got up and started to dance. Nobody has really explored the fact that her dancing wasn’t a spur-of-the-moment thing that came out of nowhere. There was a background, history, and set of roots that motivated her to dance that night. It wasn’t mere happenstance that my mother ended up getting up and doing her number at Newport. The seeds were planted a long time earlier.

PostGenre: Elaine wanted to be a dancer originally, but gave it up to raise a family. In some ways, it was almost inevitable that she would dance that night.

RA: It was inevitable. I have to qualify that I’m not an unprejudiced person here. So, you have to take what I say with a certain grain of salt. But, trying to be as objective as I can, my mother represented the breakthrough of women in the 1950s who were still trapped in society’s norms and limitations. She tried her damnedest to break out of a traditional married setting. People who knew her all saw it. She was a very special, talented, and different person. And she touched a lot of people, many more people than anybody really knows.

But it all started when she got into Wellesley College, and her mother said, “No, you have to go to a two-year college.” Her mother was a very dominating force. My mother tried to break through and ended up getting married at eighteen. She had three kids by the time she was twenty-four. But in the meantime, she went out to Hollywood, got a screen test, and had a few bit parts in movies. That’s not the traditional path that a married woman would take at the time, back in the 1940s.

PG: Your family also had ties to the movie industry, with Elaine’s father starting one of the first movie theaters in New England.  

RA: Right, my grandfather and his brothers started it. Back then, unlike today, motion picture theater owners had leverage over the Hollywood studios. That leverage meant that Hollywood came to the owners to pitch films to show as opposed to the opposite. During that period, as my mother was growing up and then into the 40s and the 50s, her family owned eight theaters in New England. In those days, that was enough for them to be recognized as a player in the industry. So, Hollywood came to them.

To give you an idea, although this happened after she had gotten married and had kids, the family’s New Bedford, Massachusetts, theater had the world premiere of Moby-Dick (Warner Bros., 1956). Of course, it made sense to choose a New Bedford theater for the premiere because the city was the whaling capital of the world. Anyway, Gregory Peck and his wife stayed in my grandparents’ house around the time of the premiere. Richard Basehart and John Huston were around, too. And there is that photo I sent you of my mother playing the piano with Robert Wagner, which was taken in her mother’s home.

Elaine Anderson with Robert Wagner, courtesy of Rick Anderson

My mother was exposed to many movie stars, even early on. And there was always simmering thing in her connected to her interest in dance and film that coalesced, I think, in 1955.

PG: What happened in 1955?

RA: Her best friend, Carol Haney, was on Broadway in The Pajama Game. My mother was so proud of Carol, and we all went down to New York to see the show. She and my mother grew up in New Bedford together and used to dance together. And now, here she was on Broadway. Carol Haney ultimately won a Tony Award [for Best Featured Actress in a Musical] for her role in The Pajama Game.

What many people don’t know about Carol is that she was a very tragic character. My grandfather helped introduce her to people in Hollywood. And she went to Hollywood when she was nineteen. If she had been prettier looking, she would have played Debbie Reynolds’s role in Singin’ in the Rain (MGM, 1952). Instead, she was the person Gene Kelly used to help teach Debbie Reynolds how to dance. She danced with the best of them, Jack Cole, and a little with [Fred] Astaire. But she particularly danced a lot with Gene Kelly. Her big break came in a movie called Kiss Me, Kate (MGM, 1953). There is a dance scene in it with her and her partner, Bob Fosse. They did a dance together in that movie that was incredible. And you can see that dance show up in the Broadway show, The Pajama Game, where she and Fosse were the leads.

Anyway, when my mother got down to Broadway and saw Carol finally receive the recognition that she deserved, I think it set in motion what would be forthcoming from my mother the next year in Newport.

PG: As far as Newport, your uncle and your mother had box seats for the festival since the first one in 1954 and went for several years. When did she stop attending the festival?

RA: She was there all the way through until she blew out of town in 1961. So, the 1960 Festival was probably her last one.

PG: So, she attended for seven years, most of them after 1955. Any idea why she did not get noticed much the times she presumably danced there after 1956?

RA: Well, you must have seen the movie Jazz on a Summer’s Day (Galaxy, 1959).  

PG: Of course.

RA: If you go back and watch that movie, you will see a blonde woman with sunglasses in the crowd when Anita O’Day is singing. The camera focuses on her. You’ll see her really getting into the rhythm. That’s Elaine.



My parents weren’t Newport people. They had a good friend who was a Newport person, but not on the side of the tracks where [Festival co-founders Elaine and Louis] Lorillards played.

PG: Was that the Capuanos? [ed. note: Eddie Capuano of Fall River, Massachusetts was an early sponsor of the Newport Jazz Festival and a friend of both the Lorillards and Anderson and her husband, Larry Anderson].

RA: Well, the Capuanos were wealthy people who had a house in Newport. My parents were down in Newport all the time visiting them. My father was actually a bigger jazz fan than my mother. My parents used to go up to [George Wein’s club,] Storyville in Boston. There were also some really good jazz places in Providence in those days that they would visit. There was even a good jazz club in Fall River, Massachusetts.

I remember my parents would corral some of the performing musicians and bring them back to our house, where they’d smoke dope in the back room. My parents loved to mingle with the jazz musicians. And of course, having the box in Newport was a must because they were part of the scene. But things only came to a head and exploded that night in 1956.

PG: Given that she wanted to be a professional dancer, it must have been exciting for her to become essentially famous for dancing, even if not in any capacity she could have ever anticipated.

RA: She enjoyed the attention. There was an unfortunate quote from her in the New York Times, which I think was misleading. There was a piece written by a guy named James Barron, who is actually still writing. The story was all about a guy named Phil Schaap.

PG: The incredibly detailed archivist and broadcaster.

RA: Right. And in that story, Phil mentioned the gal in the black dress who danced at Newport, but he didn’t know who she was. Our daughter saw the piece when she was eight or nine years old and wrote to Barron to say “that gal in the black dress is my grandmother.” James Barron turned around and said he wanted to talk to my mother. So, he then interviewed both Elaine and me and wrote a story about how he had solved the mystery of who the woman was; a mystery that even Phil Schaap wasn’t able to answer.  But Elaine made the unfortunate comment in her interview that the story behind her dance in 1956 was that she had a few too many drinks and got up and danced. I think at that point, she was trying not to be totally honest about what she was really all about.

But the truth is, she lived a really interesting life. Once, when she was living out in Sausalito, California, she walked into a very famous restaurant in San Francisco named Ernie’s. And in there was a very famous local guy named Joe DiMaggio.

PG: Joltin’ Joe.

RA: She walked in, and he saw her. He did a double take and then called over the maître’d and said, “I want to talk to that woman.” I think he thought Elaine looked like Marilyn Monroe. So they sat down, and they chatted. My mother managed to encounter a lot of different people after she got divorced. She was a free spirit. It took a lot of guts for her to leave a small town like Fall River, Massachusetts, and give up a life where she was the queen of the town and married to a very wealthy guy, to go off and do what she did.

She’d spent some time in Hollywood and was a member of the Variety Club. You could only be part of the Variety Club if you were a professional or someone in the motion picture business, whether on stage or off stage or screen. The Variety Club had yearly conventions in great places. In 1958, her wings started to flap, and she felt like she needed to get the hell out of Fall River. So she convinced my father to let her go to the Variety Club convention in London. He agreed to it, and she went. The only problem with the convention was that it lasted for about four or five days. She didn’t come back for another seven months.

PG: Wow.

RA: When she got to London, she met a very beautiful woman named Francine Brandt. Francine was, I guess, the French word was courtesan. She was not a prostitute; but a companion who lived with or associated with incredibly wealthy people. We don’t really have courtesans much in the US, but it is common in Europe. Francine was French, and she had an affair with the French filmmaker Roger Vadim. She knew that crowd. So she and my mother hook up and then go all over the place. They finally ended up in Rome. And she ends up being gone for seven months. Of course, she has three kids at home. Not too many mothers take off like that. And she herself hooked up with some Italian movie star. As I said, she was a free spirit. I knew she was one back when I was a kid, too. But again, going back to when we started talking, she just wasn’t some anonymous person who got up and decided who decided to spontaneously dance.






PG: Why do you think the narrative of her being an average person in the crowd still perpetuates? Even the famous photograph [record producer] George Avakian used of her for Ellington’s record is framed in such a way as to suggest she was an average person with no formal dance background.

RA: Interesting. We got to know George Avakian well. Elaine said to him at Newport the year after the Ellington performance, 1957, “Why did you use such a lousy picture?” And he said he was concerned she might sue the label over using a photo of her without her approval. That’s why they used the picture with her arm up, somewhat blocking her face. They wanted to avoid having her come at them. She said she wouldn’t have sued over it and that they should have followed up with her on it.

PG: Did they not know who she was, since there seems to be a bit of a mystery around the dancing figure at the Festival?

RA: I think they knew her. George Wein knew who she was since she had been up in Storyville. As you’ve read in all the articles, the question that comes is whether she just popped up and also how much of an influence she had on Gonsalves that night. You can read the history any way you want to, but the fact of the matter is that she was part of the mix.

Something like what happened that evening had never happened before. We’ve seen it so many times since, but never before. There was a video that came out a few years ago and made an analogy between rock ‘n’ roll and that night. It compares Gonsalves’ solo to non-jazz solos and found that the performance was jazz’s moment of stepping into the world of rock ‘n’ roll.



PG: Interesting. Rock was the big musical craze at the time, but few have connected it to what Ellington did. Jazz was not really dying, but it was not really getting the popular attention it once did.

RA: Yeah, despite the fact that Ellington said he was born again in Newport in 1956, his music really didn’t die. I don’t think big band jazz took off after that, but that night did show the power his music still held even as tastes shifted.  And of course, the papers followed, and there was a flurry of publicity afterwards.



PG: Seventy years later, why do you think people still talk about your mother’s dancing at the Ellington performance? There is no video and limited photography, yet it still seems to capture the imagination of many.

RA: I know what you mean. My dream has always been to find enough still pictures that I could piece together into a fifteen minute video.

I’m having lunch today with a guy named George Russell. He and I belong to the same tennis club. I met him about a year and a half ago at the club. He was a journalist for Fox Broadcasting, and used to be an international journalist with Time Magazine. At one point, we were chatting along with some other friends. One of my other friends mentioned my mother because George is infatuated with what happened at Newport. So George asked which festival and I told him it was Ellington at Newport in 1956. And he said the record was one of his favorites. He absolutely loved Diminuendo and Crescendo in Blue. And we ended up talking for a while about the gal that danced. It just shows you how the story still speaks to people.







PG: It’s interesting too because the album tied to that night, Ellington at Newport 1956, is generally cited as one of the best live albums ever, but only a portion was actually done at the festival, with the rest in studio. Even the studio parts, however. capture the energy of that night so well that you can almost see your mother or someone dancing to it when you listen.

RA: There is a very famous jazz photographer named Roy DeCarava. About ten or eleven years ago, he self-published a big coffee table book called The Sound I Saw.  At the time it came out, my daughter was a freshman or sophomore at Brown [University]. She was at the [Rhode Island School of Design] Museum in Providence to see an exhibit of DeCarava’s photographs. As she was leaving, she saw his book on the table.  She looked through it and came to the end where she found pictures of a blonde woman in a very surreal way dancing with her arms up. There were four pictures. This book had photographs of almost every jazz musician you could think of. But here was Elaine, captured in photographs that I’d never seen before. So my daughter called me and told me she had encountered the book.

The book was hard to find, but we found a copy and reached out to DeCarava. He’s since passed but was a professor at Hunter College at that time. He had printed all of his own stuff. He never had an agent because he was fearful of being commercialized. So he never really got the attention that some other jazz photographers did. After many weeks of back-and-forth emails with him, my wife and I had lunch with him and his wife, Caroline, who was another Hunter professor, here in Brooklyn Heights, New York. 





Elaine as captured by Roy DeCarava

PG: Did he remember being at the ‘56 festival?

RA: Definitely. And it was fascinating talking to him. For Newport in ’56, he didn’t have tickets to get in. He was outside the box office when he ran into Nat Hentoff, who knew him. Nat and Roy started talking, and Nat ended up helping Roy get into Freebody Park that night. Roy said it was an incredible night. He said what happened was surreal. He said the place became alive. And he captured it all in a way that made the truth clear. Some accounts say that there were other people dancing that night in Freebody Park. That was probably the case, but it was clear nobody danced like this gal. And it all came out of what was stuck inside of her for decades.

One of the raciest magazines back then, Saga Magazine, covered the festival that summer. Their writer described the dance as a cross between Salome’s Seven Veils and a Gypsy Rose Lee special. Some photographs show she used the white bars that separated the seating sections as a crutch to bounce off of. She was basically in her own trance. But it was in sync with Gonsalves and the band. And Jo Jones is up there with a rolled-up newspaper, five feet from her, saying, “Go gal, go gal, go gal.” Off she went.

Rob Shepherd is the founder, CEO, editor-in-chief and head writer of PostGenre. He is a proud member of the Jazz Journalists Association. Rob also contributed to Jazz Speaks, the official blog of The Jazz Gallery and has also so written for All About Jazz and Nextbop. Rob is also a Tax and Estate Planning Attorney and CPA. 

No copyright infringement intended.







Thursday, 2 July 2026

Cuttings Contest Too

Bizarrely - if not frighteningly so - the first time I used the title Cuttings Contest for a post was an amazing ten years ago and, by some strange synchronism, a decade almost to the day. That post may be found here.

Here is its somewhat delayed sequel - a miscellany of clippings, photographs and memorabilia all of which have been for sale at virtual auction recently. When time allows (and given how quickly the last ten years have gone), I'm not sure it will - it would be a rewarding business tracing the provenance of these various souvenirs and the events which occasioned them. For now, here is the gallery...

































Tuesday, 21 April 2026

The Jazz Syndicate (University of North Texas)

 

Clips of multiple interviews with Duke Ellington from various dates and locations. The first segment is described as "transcribed presentation of the western division of Radio Newsreel," likely conducted by Doug Hatton at Casa Mañana in Los Angeles on January 28, 1941 and also described by Lewis Porter in a November 13, 2024 Substack posting. The second segment features Ellington narrating a story which may be connected to his unfinished opera, Queenie Pie. Segments of this are fast-forwarded or rewound on the tape, and at least one is recoverable at normal speed. Another interview follows, in which Ellington discusses Jack and Hy Yellen, noted to be from the interviewer's hometown of Buffalo, New York (this interviewer is not Willis Conover). Also present for this interview is Fats Waller's manager, Ed Kirkeby. After a brief silence, another interview begins at 22:19, in which the interviewer is likely Willis Conover. Details of this interview (the end of 1952 being "a few weeks ago") fit with Ellington's appearance at the Hilltop in Capitol Heights, Maryland, in early March of 1953. The next interview begins at 40:21, and includes Billy Strayhorn speaking, and singing and playing Lush Life at the piano (at 45:55). Smaller segments follow, including an additional segment with Strayhorn.
Clips of two interviews with Duke Ellington from the Ellington collection at the Smithsonian Institution. The interview is undated, but labeled as being from the late 1960s or early 1970s. Ellington answers a question about whether some works are more important to him and discusses his longevity, experience and perseverance, the meaning of Black, Brown and Beige, segregation in the South, and an experience in the previous year of being refused service in Illinois.
A brief interview with Duke Ellington, with an introduction and explanation in Swedish. Ellington discusses how the scale or size of a work does not dictate its importance to him, whether any works are more important to him than others, the importance of staying on the job over time; in another clip, he discusses his Black, Brown & Beige suite, racial dynamics he has observed, and a time he faced discrimination while touring on Route 66 in Illinois.